Reading Test 41

The Dinosaurs Footprints and Extinction

EVERYBODY knows that the dinosaurs were killed by an asteroid. Something big hit the earth 65 million years ago and, when the dust had fallen, so had the great reptiles. There is thus a nice, if ironic, symmetry in the idea that a similar impact brought about the dinosaurs’ rise. That is the essence proposed by Paul Olsen, of Columbia University, and his colleagues in this week’s Science.

Dinosaurs first appear in the fossil record 230m years ago, during the Triassic period. But they were mostly small, and they shared the earth with lots of other sorts of reptiles. It was in the subsequent Jurassic, which began 202 million years ago, that they overran the planet and turned into the monsters depicted in the book and movie “Jurassic Park”. (Actually, though, the dinosaurs that appeared on screen were from the still more recent Cretaceous period.) Dr Olsen and his colleagues are not the first to suggest that the dinosaurs inherited the earth as the result of an asteroid strike. But they are the first to show that the takeover did, indeed, happen in a geological eye blink.

Dinosaur skeletons are rare. Dinosaur footprints are, however, surprisingly abundant. And the sizes of the prints are as good an indication of the sizes of the beasts as the skeletons themselves. Olsen and his colleagues therefore concentrated on prints, not bones.

The prints in question were made in eastern North America, a part of the world full of rift valleys similar to those in East Africa today. Like the modern African rift valleys, the Triassic/Jurassic American ones contained lakes, and these lakes grew and shrank at regular intervals because of climatic changes caused by periodic shifts in the earth’s orbit. That regularity, combined with reversals in the earth’s magnetic field, means that rocks from this place and period can be dated to within a few thousand years. As a bonus, squishy lake-edge sediments are ideal for recording the tracks of passing animals. By dividing the labour between themselves, the ten authors of the paper were able to study such tracks at 80 sites.

The researchers looked at 18 so-called ichnotaxa. These are recognizable types of footprint that cannot be matched precisely with the species of animal that left them. But they can be matched with a general sort of animal, and thus act as an indicator of the fate of that group, even when there are no bones to tell the story. Five of the ichnotaxa disappear before the end of the Triassic, and four march confidently across the boundary into the Jurassic. Six, however, vanish at the boundary, or only just splutter across it and there appear from nowhere, almost as soon as the Jurassic begins.

That boundary itself is suggestive. The first geological indication of the impact that killed the dinosaurs was an unusually high level of iridium in rocks at the end of the Cretaceous, when the beasts disappear from the fossil record. Iridium is normally rare at the earth’s surface, but it is more abundant in meteorites. When people began to believe the impact theory, they started looking for other Cretaceous anomalies. One that turned up was a surprising abundance of fern spores in rocks just above the boundary layer – a phenomenon known as a “fern spike”.

That matched the theory nicely. Many modern ferns are opportunists. They cannot compete against plants with leaves, but if a piece of land is cleared by, say, a volcanic eruption, they are often the first things to pop up there. An asteroid strike would have covered much of the earth of its vegetable cover, and provided a paradise for ferns. A fern spike in the rocks is thus a good indication that something terrible has happened.

Both an iridium anomaly and a fern spike appear in rocks at the end of the Triassic, too. That accounts for the disappearing ichnotaxa: the creatures that made them did not survive the holocaust. The surprise is how rapidly the new ichnotaxa appear.

Dr Olsen and his colleagues suggest that the explanation for this rapid increase in size may be a phenomenon called ecological release. This is seen today when reptiles reach islands where they face no competitors. The most spectacular example is on the Indonesian island of Komodo, where local lizards have grown so large that they are often referred to as dragons. The dinosaurs, in other words, could flourish only when the competition had been knocked out.

That leaves the question of where the impact happened. No large hole in the earth’s crust seems to be 202m years old. It may, of course, have been overlooked. Old craters are eroded and buried, and not always easy to find. Alternatively, it may have vanished. Although continental crust is more or less permanent, the ocean floor is constantly recycled by the tectonic processes that bring about continental drift. There is no ocean floor left that is more than 200m years old, so a crater that formed in the ocean would have been swallowed up by now.

There is a third possibility, however. This is that the crater is known, but has been misdated. The Manicouagan “structure”, a crater in Quebec, is thought to be 214m years old. It is huge – some 100km across – and seems to be the largest of between three and five craters that formed within a few hours of each other as the lumps of a disintegrated comet hit the earth one by one.

This quiz is for logged in users only.


The Evolution of Film Making

A
Film making, as both an artistic pursuit and commercial industry, has undergone remarkable changes since its beginnings in the late 19th century. Early films were short, silent, and lacked narrative complexity, yet they quickly captivated audiences. These first glimpses of moving pictures laid the foundation for what would become one of the most influential cultural forces in the modern world.

B
The 1920s brought a revolution with the introduction of synchronized sound—commonly known as “talkies.” This advancement not only allowed actors to speak but also added music and sound effects, enriching the cinematic experience. However, this change was not welcomed by all. Many silent film stars struggled to adapt, and production costs increased significantly. Still, the innovation marked a decisive shift that firmly established Hollywood as the global center of the film industry.

C
As the industry matured, countries around the world began to develop their own cinematic traditions. European directors like Ingmar Bergman and Jean-Luc Godard explored philosophical and experimental themes, while Japan’s Akira Kurosawa blended traditional storytelling with cinematic flair. In India, Hollywood grew into a cultural phenomenon, producing musicals that blended drama, romance, and social commentary. These diverse traditions enriched the global film landscape and demonstrated the versatility of the medium.

D
In the latter half of the 20th century, technological innovations like color film, special effects, and widescreen projection enhanced storytelling. The 1970s and 1980s witnessed the rise of the blockbuster, with films like Star Wars and E.T. dominating theaters and redefining marketing strategies. At the same time, independent filmmakers used more modest budgets to explore unconventional narratives, challenging the mainstream.

E
With the advent of digital technology, film making became more accessible. Digital cameras and editing tools significantly reduced costs, allowing amateur and indie creators to produce high-quality work. Simultaneously, streaming platforms disrupted traditional distribution models. Services like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime made it possible to release content globally without theatrical runs, altering how audiences consume media.

F
Despite these innovations, critics have expressed concerns about the creative stagnation of modern cinema. Many studios prioritize sequels, franchises, and remakes over original content, leading to debates about artistic integrity. Yet, festivals like Sundance and Cannes continue to spotlight independent films and new voices, ensuring that innovation and experimentation remain central to the industry.

G
Education in film making has also expanded, with universities worldwide offering specialized programs. These courses teach not only directing and screenwriting but also technical skills like cinematography and sound design. As the tools of film making become more democratic, the diversity of perspectives within the industry has grown, providing audiences with stories from previously underrepresented voices.

This quiz is for logged in users only.


Sign, Baby, Sign!

A
Language is a powerful tool that humans use for a wide variety of purposes—from expressing emotions and sharing ideas to passing down cultural values and acquiring knowledge. It is not limited to spoken words; gestures, facial expressions, and even posture all contribute to how we communicate. Language, whether signed or spoken, plays a vital role in how we engage with the world around us.

B
In recent years, many American schools have begun to recognize American Sign Language (ASL) as a valid foreign language credit, just like Spanish or French. This change has opened the door for hearing students to choose ASL as an academic subject, which not only gives them a practical skill but also increases their awareness of and empathy toward the Deaf community. Some educators believe this early exposure may even influence students to pursue careers in special education, speech therapy, or interpreting.

C
One clear benefit of learning ASL for hearing children is the opportunity for broader social interaction. Children who understand ASL can communicate with deaf peers, making their social circles more inclusive. Additionally, they may find it easier to express complex ideas or emotions non-verbally, which is helpful in noisy environments or when verbal speech isn’t possible.

D
Dr. Marilyn Daniels, a researcher and advocate for baby sign language, has spent over two decades studying the impact of signing on early communication. While she promotes the use of sign language with infants, she emphasizes that there is no need for parents to invent their own signs. Instead, she suggests that parents use ASL or another standardized system to ensure consistency and eventual recognition by others.

E
Very young children often develop motor skills before verbal skills. Dr. Daniels notes that even babies as young as six months can learn to use simple signs like “milk” or “more” with their hands, long before they can articulate those words. This early form of communication can reduce frustration for both babies and their parents—and may even accelerate speech development.

Studies have shown that hearing children exposed to sign language from an early age tend to have stronger reading skills by the time they enter primary school. It is believed that learning sign language can strengthen understanding of symbolic representation and grammar, both of which are foundational to literacy. These cognitive advantages suggest that signing benefits not only communication but academic success as well.

G
There remains some debate about the best approach to language instruction for deaf children. Some educators argue that speech and lip reading should come first, while others advocate for immediate exposure to sign language.

Dr. Daniels believes the latter is more effective and less frustrating for the child. She calls the idea that children must learn to lip-read before learning sign language “an outdated notion.” She, along with other advocates, stresses that deaf children have a right to a full, accessible language from birth—and that language is often sign.

This quiz is for logged in users only.


Desktop Experience Recommended

This website is currently optimized for laptop and desktop devices only.

Please open this website from a computer to access all features properly.

Mobile & Tablet Access Restricted
Scroll to Top